refactor: Optimizing format_cnpj and remove_symbols#677
Closed
rafaelcalixto wants to merge 1 commit intobrazilian-utils:mainfrom
Closed
refactor: Optimizing format_cnpj and remove_symbols#677rafaelcalixto wants to merge 1 commit intobrazilian-utils:mainfrom
rafaelcalixto wants to merge 1 commit intobrazilian-utils:mainfrom
Conversation
Member
|
salve meu querido @rafaelcalixto aqui entramos na mesma questão que me levou a dar um revert naquele teu pr #668 pensando sempre que não podemos mudar a assinatura das funções pra não quebrar a galera que tá com o pacote instalado no projeto.. por isso vou acabar fechando esse teu pr mas me dá uns dias que arrumo um pra ti.. não vou te deixar sem serviço 😆 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Descrição
Neste PR eu refatorei as funções remove_symbols e format_cnpj fundindo as duas funções em apenas uma (format_cnpj ) e adicionando a validação de tipo para a função.
Mudanças Propostas
Checklist de Revisão
Issue Relacionada
#676
Closes #676